Producers ask us all the time how CopyCat stacks up against Outmarket. Here is the straight answer in one table: the things that matter on a renewal, side by side.
“Yea we regret paying them, it never worked.”
A CopyCat customer who came over from Outmarket
The side-by-side
| CopyCat | Outmarket | |
|---|---|---|
| Proposals that actually ship without rebuilding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Word-doc editor: type, fix, regenerate | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fast: a full proposal in minutes, not hours | ✓ | ✗ |
| Your exact template: brand, colors, sections, all of it | ✓ | ✗ |
| Built with real producers, not focus groups | ✓ | ✗ |
| We onboard you personally and set everything up | ✓ | ✗ |
| Month-to-month, cancel anytime, no exit fees | ✓ | ✗ |
| Page-level citations back to the carrier PDF | ✓ | ✗ |
| Renewal diff between expiring and new policy | ✓ | ✗ |
| Direct line to the team, and features ship from your calls | ✓ | ✗ |
| Commercial, personal, employee benefits, and LTC/STC workflows | ✓ | See current product scope |
| If a workflow does not work | Six-hour fix commitment | Not advertised publicly |
| New features and hands-on help | Included at one price | See contract |
| Fully web-based; customer documents never train AI | ✓ | See current security terms |
| Time per proposal | 60–90 seconds | Unknown |
What the table actually means
The Outmarket proposal module looks fine on the demo and falls apart on a real renewal. Numbers don't match the source. The editor is a form with thirty fields. The template is a watered-down version of your brand. You spend most of the “saved” time rebuilding the proposal by hand.
CopyCat was built alongside producers who shipped renewals every day and were tired of that loop. Every proposal cites back to the carrier PDF page-by-page. The editor is a Word doc: drop in, fix the typo, regenerate. The template is yours, pixel-perfect. The setup is on us. The contract is month-to-month.
That workflow fit is deliberate. The initial CopyCat product was built in person with brokers, sitting beside them and watching how work actually moved from quote intake through review and client presentation. Both founders took the commercial broker exam to understand the full broker lifecycle. CopyCat molds around how an agency works instead of asking the agency to reorganize itself around the software.
The product you buy keeps getting better
CopyCat is not a proposal module that stands still after the contract is signed. The same platform now supports commercial lines, personal lines, employee benefits, and LTC/STC workflows. New features come directly from the problems customers bring us, and they are included at one price instead of being turned into a new module and a new bill.
The operating promise matters just as much as the feature list. If something in a live workflow does not work, CopyCat commits to fixing it within six hours. Your team gets a person, a resolution, and a product that is more capable a few months after purchase than it was on day one. That combination makes CopyCat the straightforward choice for a brokerage that wants software it can actually depend on.
CopyCat is fully web-based, requires nothing to install, and never uses customer documents to train AI. If an output does not look great, reach out and the team will work on it with you. We have never had a customer leave because the product was not good.
Try it on a real account
The fastest way to see the difference is to put your own renewal in front of CopyCat. Bring a recent account with the supplementals, carrier quotes, and the whole packet, and we'll run it live on the call. If it isn't obvious in the first five minutes, we'll tell you straight.