Coverage lines and limits
Identify the required types and amounts of insurance and compare them with the supplied evidence.
Match contractual insurance requirements to the policies behind them. See what is met, what falls short, and which documents you still need.
| Requirement | Policy evidence | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Liability limit$1M required | $1M evidenced | Met |
| Umbrella limit$5M required | $2M evidenced | Gap |
| Additional insuredRequired | Form not supplied | Not evidenced |

















In the example above
Identify the required types and amounts of insurance and compare them with the supplied evidence.
Review the requested wording and the relevant policy endorsement; do not assume a certificate establishes the answer.
Check requirements such as waiver of subrogation and primary and noncontributory treatment against the supplied forms.
Separate an evidenced shortfall from a question that cannot yet be answered.
Keep the contractual requirement and the supporting policy language available for verification.
Record the missing documents or clarifications needed before confirming a requirement.
Upload the client contract and supporting coverage documents. Match each requirement to the policy language your team needs to verify.
Declarations alone may not establish additional-insured status. Obtain the endorsement before confirming the requirement.
Contract review checks contractual requirements against coverage evidence. Policy checking compares issued coverage with the approved placement.
It helps organize the insurance requirements in a client contract and compare them with supplied policy evidence. CopyCat creates source-linked findings for the broker to verify; it does not issue a legal opinion or guarantee coverage.
The review can identify additional-insured requirements and examine supplied coverage evidence. If the relevant endorsement or wording is missing, obtain it before confirming the requirement.
The supplied documents do not establish whether the requirement is met. It is a request for more evidence, not a conclusion that coverage is absent.
No. Contract review compares contractual requirements with evidence of coverage. Policy checking compares the issued policy with the expected placement and account details.
No. Source references and structured findings can support a more consistent review, but professional judgment, follow-up, and clear client communication remain necessary.
“Fast, accurate, a game changer. Repetitive tasks that used to eat our day are fully automated.”
“Jumped us ahead months. Fast onboarding, faster output than we could have built ourselves.”
Requirements, evidence, and open questions in one review.